CRITERIA OF ARGUMENT EVALUATION: INFORMAL LOGIC VERSUS FORMAL DIALECTICS

Authors

  • Вікторія Леонідівна Бабюк Київський національний університет імені Тараса Шевченка, Ukraine

Keywords:

argumentation theory, argument evaluation, informal logic, formal dialectics, RAS-model

Abstract

It is necessary to find out which of the argument evaluation criteria proposed in different approaches are more universal and take into account the peculiarities of argumentative reasoning operating in real discourse.

Author Biography

Вікторія Леонідівна Бабюк, Київський національний університет імені Тараса Шевченка

аспірантка

References

Allen, D., "Should We Assess the Basic Premises of an Argument for Truth or Acceptability?", OSSA Conference Archive, Paper 6, May 15, 1997.

Blair, J. A., The Groundwork of Argumentation Theory, Springer, 2012.

Govier, T., Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation, Dordrecht-Holland: Foris Publications, 1987.

Hamblin, Ch. L., Fallacies, Methuen young books; 1st edition, 1970.

Johnson, R. H., Blair J. A., 1994, Logical self–defence, McGraw-Hill, Inc., US edition.

Pinto, R. C., J. A. Blair, K. E. Parr. Reasoning. Scarborough: Prentice-HallCanada Inc., 1993.

Toulmin S., The uses of argument, Cambridge University Press; Updated edition, 2003.

Walton, D., Relevance in argumentation, Amsterdam, Routledge, 2003.

Issue

Section

SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL AND PEDAGOGICAL DETERMINANTS AND VALUES OF SOCIAL WORK